The Angel’s Game by Carlos Ruiz Zafón

I liked this one better. That’s right– I enjoyed The Angel’s Game even more than The Shadow of the Wind. It’s not like claiming a preference for the Star Wars prequels, but it’ll get me weird looks.

Hey, down in front, cabrón, you’re in the way of the dust jacket.

This is the follow-up to Spanish author Carlos Ruiz Zafon’s bestseller The Shadow of the Wind, which had even cynics believing that the term “literary thriller” isn’t always an oxymoron. The Angel’s Game is a prequel of sorts. Centering around a new character, it takes place a generation earlier in 1930s Barcelona, an extravagantly miserable city where everyone thinks they’re a writer.

David Martín is the author of the bestselling series of lurid penny-dreadfuls called “City of the Damned.” He spent his young adult life writing these crime stories like clockwork from his home, a foreboding tower house in the city. In churning them out, he was fueled by a dark inspiration he couldn’t explain (not to mention jittering handfuls of drugs), and life takes an ugly turn when he’s diagnosed with a deadly brain tumor and his lifelong crush marries his rival.

But then a mysterious publisher, Andreas Corelli, offers him a small fortune if he’ll write a “fable” that can be the basis of a new religion. As Martín accepts the Faustian pact, he becomes a rich man and his health inexplicably recovers. But people begin dying around him, and the tower house reveals clues of the previous writer who accepted Corelli’s book deal.

As you can tell, this one’s more Poe than Dickens. The core mystery in The Angel’s Game lacks the labyrinthine depth of its predecessor, but it introduces possibly supernatural elements that take Martín’s story to a much darker place.

Descent into Madness? Check.

So as far as I’m concerned, advantage: Angel’s Game.  What’s more, Martín’s a terrific protagonist. Whereas Daniel Sempere was a thoughtful dullard who required the company of vivid characters, David is an asshole– an asshole you can support, mind you, as he doesn’t fully deserve his onslaught of misfortunes. He’s that kind of writer who embraces his misery with a roll of the eyes as he lights a cigar. It is odd , though, how he’s not acutely aware of the Mephistophelian aspect of his employer.

(And if you’ve read this book and think that’s a spoiler, I’ve got a big bouncy ball for you to go play with)

Even still, Ruiz Zafón populates the stage with some strong characters, which include those dredged up from their lonely, squalid hovels as David investigates the past. In a subplot that just barely fits into this story, Martín becomes the reluctant mentor to a seventeen-year-old wannabe writer, Isabella, and their relationship is just a gem. They each make sarcastic reference to their companionship as a Mr. Rochester-Jane Eyre pairing, and like much of the dialogue in this book, I love their barbed exchanges to goddamn pieces. But alas, his heart belongs to Cristina, the aforementioned crush who married his best friend. She, by the way, is not really a character so much as a Holy Grail to be snatched away again and again as a means of torturing our protagonist…

That it’s a better book than The Shadow of the Wind doesn’t even seem debatable to me– that is, until the plot sees the finish line and steps on the gas. The climactic chases and struggles constitute a spastic mess, and the body count becomes downright Shakespearean, which goes to show that if you’re having trouble tying up loose ends in your story, start killing off as many characters as you can.

The dismount isn’t entirely graceless. What ultimately happens to Martín is so horribly bittersweet, it leaves me a little more shaken as I think about it.

So yeah, different book from the first. But both are generally well written, and both, of course, contain that overt “book love” in all its pandering glory:

“I stepped into the bookshop and breathed in that perfume of paper and magic that strangely no one had ever thought of bottling.”

Read it if

1. A Spanish-inflected Poe mystery sounds too good to pass up

and

2. You like, or at least tolerate, ambiguous endings

The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood

“Could it happen here?”

I’ve given it some thought, and I’ve decided that’s not a helpful question to ask about a dystopian novel. More on that below, but first I’d like to tell you about a little book I read called The Handmaid’s Tale. 

This fall, eveningwear color trends are vermillion, crimson, terra cotta…

After a hostile takeover, the U.S. has become the Republic of Gilead, a society founded on Puritanical principles. Ah, how things come full circle. At the same time, birthrates suffer as environmental pollution handicaps a woman’s ability to carry a healthy baby to term. Offred (named for her current Commander “Fred”) is one of the Handmaidens forced to serve as a surrogate mother and sex partner for an officer. The Commander’s wife is also very present for these desperate baby-making sessions. The old Commander, however, wants to make Offred more than a monthly pounding post and begins inviting her to secret sessions in his study for… Scrabble.

Fun Fact: Reading the sections with Scrabble, creepy threesomes, and Bible readings on Rachel and Leah with a Barry White song playing in the background adds an irresistible layer to the proceedings.

Separated from her husband and daughter, Offred longs for information on their whereabouts– assuming they’re still alive. She begins seeing cracks in the society’s preachy facade, and perhaps even a chance for escape.

In these stories, of course, things must get better before they get worse. Once the protagonist begins enjoying some freedoms, you should only dread the fall.

Prude New World

You’d think that the rarification of childbirth would make women all the more precious, improving their status, but it does the opposite; here, their childbearing ability supercedes them as people. Women judged to be barren are cast off to “The Colonies” as “Unwomen.” Even those who might be fertile are treated with delicacy instead of respect: no reading or exercise for you, my girl– wouldn’t want to spoil those ovaries or whatever.

But nobody wins in this system; Atwood herself doesn’t consider this a strictly feminist novel. The pious women who propped up this patriarchy are unhappy, the cannon-fodder beta males who might be issued a wife are unhappy, even the Commander is unhappy in his lack of having a real partner to connect with. The authors I admire most are those who show authentic sympathy for their ideological opponents without acquiescing to them, and Atwood shows herself to be one of these.

Story-wise, this thing’s a pageturner. Not just from the plot intrigue above but also the anticipation of an explanation. As Offred’s narrative alternates between past and present, Atwood goes hopping back and forth over “The Thing That Happened” (a tongue-in-cheek term from Jasper Fforde’s Shades of Grey I’ve adopted for every dystopian story), and this creates tension as the clashing realities of the before and the after squeeze together: “Tell me what caused this! What was The Thing That Happened?” The Handmaid’s Tale makes the transition between the Life Before and the Life After seem… hardly a transition at all. Instantaneous, really.

Which presents a problem. 1984, Brave New World, Anthem, The Hunger Games… none of these stories features a protagonist who’s seen both the before and after, and now I know why. It’s an incredibly tough sell. Normally a dystopian novel can sort of brush aside the catastrophe, if it bothers to describe it at all, but The Handmaid’s Tale can’t do that. The head-spinningly fast regime change is now part of the plot and has to be addressed for plausibility, and if you can roll with the idea of a fringe group machinegunning the entire Executive and Legislative Branches to feeble public response, then you’re probably very, very nice to books.

On the other hand, I wouldn’t judge a dystopian novel on the likelihood of its nightmare scenario: that just turns the book into 300-page slippery slope fallacy. Dystopian lit’s aim isn’t to be predictive so much as insightful on the present. I’m confident that The Handmaid’s Tale will never happen in the U.S., but I recognize the seeds of that fictional society plunked into the soil of the one I’m living in, and regardless of whether they’ll sprout or not I find them unacceptable. It makes me hyperaware of things I already know to be wrong.

Hyperawareness is what good dystopian lit gives you. After you read about a bronchial epidemic that wipes out most of the world’s population, you’ll shudder when someone behind you in line has a coughing fit.

Overall, The Handmaid’s Tale can stand with the giants of the genre, as far as I’m concerned. From Atwood’s prose to Offred’s introspection, every little detail matters, and it’s an entertaining read. Beyond that, its insights on gender politics are at once fair and uncompromising, and I give a thumbs up to teachers who place it on their syllabus. If they’re in Texas, though, they might have some trouble.

Read it if

1. It’s time for some good speculative fiction from the ladies’ perspective

and

2. You can handle criticism on the idea of the “Christian state”

The Shadow of the Wind by Carlos Ruiz Zafón

God knows there’s no shortage of novels like this. A mystery centering on a love for books? I feel aggressively pandered to. I respond to booky thrillers as I would a girl wearing a Princess Leia gold bikini, resentful of the assumption that they’ve totally got my number.

So I approach literary thrillers with a raised eyebrow, which doesn’t descend unless 50 pages go by that don’t suck.

Hey, kid… look where you’re… you’re about to run into that.

And I’m happy to report that such a thing eventually happened with The Shadow of the Wind, a solidly written, sorta-Gothic literary bestseller that had critics hailing Carlos Ruiz Zafón as an equal of Byatt and Eco, some even going so far as to say he surpasses Dickens. I wouldn’t canonize it by any means, but The Shadow of the Wind is one the strongest examples of a literary thriller I’ve come across.

Daniel Sempere, son of a modest Barcelona bookseller, comes into the possession of a one-of-a-kind novel, The Shadow of the Wind, penned by a little-known virtuoso named Julián Carax. You know that one novel that seems to bond forever with your book-loving soul? This one becomes Daniel’s, and though he’s offered a small fortune for the book, he won’t part with it. Soon a mysterious figure appears who, hell-bent on annihilating Carax’s legacy, burns every copy of Carax he can get his hands on, and he will have Daniel’s with little negotiation. Investigating the stalker, Daniel finds himself entrenched in a labyrinth of what can only be scandal and murder.

Early on, this book didn’t have me. It pulls the same nonsense that The Historian (a vastly inferior book) did, applying artificial suspense by having its villainous marauder appear in some window or alleyway and do nothing.

Reader: Carlos, it’s been three more chapters and you haven’t progressed the central conflict at all.

Zafon: ‘… a-a-and then out of the corner of his eye he sees that same man in the dark suit! Dun-dun-dun!’ Ah, yes, you were bitching about something?

Reader: Yeah, that’s not conflict. That’s just you pressing the Dun-dun-dun button at the end of each chapter.

Zafon: You know what? Eat shit.

Carlos Ruiz Zafon’s probably a nice man in real life.

The Real Twist? It’s Pretty Good.

Some have called this novel overlong, which I wouldn’t say, but do I see this being a better mystery if it hit the ground running with Daniel age 18 and referencing some of the younger, formative experiences in flashbacks. The thing is, Zafon wants this to be both a thriller and a coming-of-age tale, but an insistence upon the latter dulls the suspense of the former. The two genres are somewhat incompatible, so it’s great as neither, but Shadow of the Wind’s Bildungsroman elements do lend it a winning poignancy, and the mystery being uncovered is good and twisty.

The characters are well drawn albeit with a couple puzzling exceptions. Daddy issues abound in Shadow of the Wind, yet the protagonist’s actual daddy manages to be a non-entity. The narrative finds little use for Mr. Sempere and leaves him languishing on the shelf like a science book in Kansas. Its main villain, the inspector known as Fumero, is marked by his grins and giggles as he threatens to boot one’s teeth out, but once the story progresses he lazes into your garden-variety asshole sociopath.

But by and large, the tragic and conniving people surrounding Daniel enliven this book. The designated scene-stealer is Fermín Romero de Torres, the rakish hobo who turns out to have been a spy during the civil war (for the losing side, hence his hobohood). Whether he’s handing out Oscar Wilde-esque insults or schooling Daniel in the enigma that is the fairer sex, he’s an endlessly entertaining sidekick.

I said earlier that this book had a Gothic feel, and that’s mostly due to the setting.  With its gaslamps and gargoyles overlooking dark alleyways, 1950s Barcelona may as well be 19th Century. The Carax backstory takes us back another 20-30 years, and besides being pre-civil war and WWII, it feels no different. This novel has a powerful sense of place, and because of that place, it’s suspended in time.

A pleasant surprise. I honestly wouldn’t mind cracking open the prequel even though the characters I met in this one will be mostly absent. The Shadow of the Wind spawned two follow-ups now, the latest having just appeared this summer, so fans of this novel still be gettin’ their Zafón.

Yeah, yeah, I’m sorry.

Read it if:

1. You’d like to have your cynicism of literary thrillers thoroughly tested.

or

2. You have no such cynicism.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers