A Word on Lit Hipster Faceoffs

Not all book discussions are friendly.

Many of them are passive-aggressive struggles for intellectual superiority. You mention a Dostoevsky book you like while at a party or study group, and then someone responds with, “Oh, but have you read Turgenev?” You bristle and say no, not yet, but right now you’re on a Gogol kick and have discovered his satirical sensibilities for both upper- and lower-class Russians to be criminally underappreciated.

It’s on.

These duels are all too common among relative strangers who read. I never went looking for them, but I wear dark-framed glasses, which is walking into the room with a rapier at your belt; they find you. Now, since I was in college, the customs have changed. In the literary world, Latin America is the new RussiaMárquez, Bolaño, Borges, and Neruda are the standards for proving your reading tastes are more sophisticated than everyone else’s, and the likes of Alejo Carpentier, Carlos Fuentes, and Julio Cortázar show you’re a true competitor.

I’ve been slow to adapt to this shift. I haven’t even read Márquez. Granted, saying you like Márquez isn’t going to impress anybody. He’s like The Shins of the Latin American authors: you’re trying, but not hard enough. Anyone who brings him up will promptly be defeated with a Mario Vargas Llosa mention. Unless, of course, the defender fortifies his/her position with a deep cut like Leaf Storm or any Márquez nonfiction, or if they’re just preparing something real nasty like the “I’ve Read Márquez-You’ve Read Llosa-But I’ve Read Miguel Angel Ásturias” counter-riposte of death.

I’m not reading One Hundred Years of Solitude for these battles. I’ve already got a book for that, and it’s served me all right. At the slightest provocation of a Latin American Lit Hipster Faceoff, I flick Pedro Paramo around like a butterfly knife until the challenger backs away.

I’m reading One Hundred Years of Solitude because it’s been said to cure babies of cleft palates. They say it grants the reader four wishes upon completion. You wouldn’t eat this book, but if you did, it would taste of mangos and unconditional love. People really like this book, basically.

If I share the enthusiasm, it could lead to an eventual arsenal of Latin American authors for conversational self defense.

Brighton Rock by Graham Greene

Graham Greene is my homeboy. I walk past him flashing gang signs.

Which in this case is a tip of the hat and a bottoms-up gesture.

He’s deciding whether to marry you or splash your face with acid.

He essentially has two categories of fiction: globe-hopping Cold War affairs and the domestic UK stories. He’s more famous for the exotic stuff, but I prefer The End of the Affair over anything else he’s done. Now with Brighton Rock, I see how much easier it is to paint an intense character portrait when you’re not spending so much time on the palm trees and car-bomb explosions in the background.

Pinkie Brown is a seventeen-year-old sociopath taking up the reins of a small mob in Brighton. He despises drink and all pleasures of the flesh, but his steely authoritarianism is just enough to lead a few goons. One day a whacking, as we call it, goes awry, and meek sixteen-year-old Rose learns a little too much. Pinkie takes it upon himself to make sure, whether by enamoring her or murdering her, that she tells nothing to nobody.

The Talented Mr. Ripley solidified for me why we sometimes enjoy reading the bad guy. If done right, the villain-centered novel has said villain come off as a fascinating individual surrounded by dullards and dingbats; his/her actions being the only ones worth following, we follow. But you don’t have to like the evil protagonist for this to work. You no more like Young Badman Brown here than you would Theon Greyjoy from Game of Thrones, but this bitch-kid’s struggle toward his own ambition is nonetheless watchable.

It follows, then, that heroine of this story is as annoying as a shirt full of mosquitoes. Still, Ida Arnold, the happy, nosy, lounge-singing tart, is a calculated foil to Pinkie in that she gets off on doing “right thing.” Also, Ida fancies herself wise in worldly matters while Rose is schooled in Christian spirituality, so those two naturally condescend to each other.

Which brings me to Brighton Rock’s tension between atheism and Catholicism– a common theme with this author. The Church flat out wins the ideological confrontation in Greene’s book, particularly the way he treats the subject of ceremony. Two unexpected horrors in the story are Pinkie’s registry-office marriage and Hale’s agnostic, lackadaisical cremation. Greene insists that even if we believe marriage to be a scrap of paper and death a big nothing that leaves behind a husk, the ceremony still matters: these events have a dignity that need to be preserved. (I’m one to ask if faith in God is required for that dignity, though.)

The Boy Ain’t Right

So Pinkie resigns to marry Rose because the law cannot compel someone to testify against a spouse. I’m sure there are ways to ensure one’s silence besides killing her or marrying her (and some married folks might even contest that one) so I’m not entirely convinced of the necessity there, so that undermines some of the story’s tension.

Still, this is a freaking fascinating book, what with its frightening protagonist and a few pitiable victims you truly worry about. Poor Rose– she’s willing to commit “mortal sin” to be with Pinkie– knowing this, Pinkie sees her damnation as his greatest achievement:

“He had a sense now that the murders… were trivial acts, a boy’s game, and he had put away childish things. Murder had only led up to this– this corruption. He was filled with awe at his own powers.”

Brighton Rock is believable in the unhappiest way. When someone is incapable of love, the one joy he can squeeze out of life is the assertion of his own will.

Read it if

1. You’ve ever liked a Graham Greene novel

or

2. You think it’s lame that Dexter has a moral code.

Read? Or Buy Cable?

TV producers nowadays are tapping published fiction left and right for the next hit series. Well, I can’t blame them.  George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire series (Game of Thrones),  Charlaine Harris’ Sookie Stackhouse novels (True Blood), and Jeff Lindsay’s Dexter novels have all become pop culture phenomena. We’re quite used to movie studios flipping through bestseller lists to score a winner at the box office, but it seems like only in recent years has cable television likewise shown such faith in books.

In any case, TV networks are buying up book rights like $3 toasters on Black Friday. Some of the recent higher profile deals have included

Neil Gaiman’s American Gods

Jonathan Franzen’s The Corrections

Jennifer Egan’s A Visit From the Goon Squad 

Jeffrey Eugenides’ Middlesex

some Faulkner novels to be named

… and that’s just HBO.

As for Showtime, they’ve got a couple Stephens working on adapting Under the DomeKing and Spielberg, those ones.

Bear in mind that purchased rights do not a series make. We’ll witness maybe a couple of these projects light up TV screens, if we’re lucky. Well, “lucky” being a subjective term– if you’re a Faulkner fan, I suggest you circulate a petition now to prevent the assured deformation of his work. I don’t see why HBO would dramatize Yoknapatawpha unless the plan were to populate it with nymphomaniacal vampires.

The Corrections already has a cast, but as for the others in the running, the smart money’s on King’s and Gaiman’s books: much of their work has already been adapted to film/TV, and in these things precedence matters greatly. Middlesex comes next on the likelihood spectrum and then Goon Squad which I greet with laughter (don’t get me wrong–I enjoyed that one, but in print).

With all of these irons in the fire, it’s hard to believe any original ideas are being developed for a premium cable series. But I don’t respond to this the way I do when Hollywood announces the next Transformers movie (for one thing, I don’t bleed mysteriously from the eyes and ears). If nothing else, I like the spirit of adapting published fiction to reach a larger audience. And while nobody’s inventing a completely new story when adapting novels, they can keep going back to that well as far as I’m concerned, so long as they draw good water from it.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 51 other followers